I've tried running subst as administrator since their are no UAC tricks to pull on this OS.ĮDIT: Of course, I figure out a solution 10 minutes after posting. Note: I observe the subst issue on Windows Server 2003 R2, running the Everything service. Thanks for the great product! The new fast size sorting capability is a major win. Is there a workaround (besides folder indexing) or is this currently broken? It all looks good, but there are 0 objects included in the database. What I have observed is that moving from 1.3 to 1.4 has made it impossible to see search results for subst volumes, even though according to the NTFS ui dialogs they can be indexed and included in the database. I'm not clear on the status of indexing subst volumes. Included volumes reset when auto include fixed volumes is unchecked in the installer.Multi-file renaming not working for some non-ascii text.-update -exit doesn't udpate database on disk if it does not exist or is out of date.subst volumes indexing the entire volume.size and date information missing when the file is opened by the system.Corruption in file names and size information on some volumes.Service 1.3 and 1.4 are incompatible, only one can be installed at a time.Missing NTFS files when a mft fragment is too large (>2GB). ![]() Old service detection needs improvement.Selection mask not invalidating old hovered items. ![]() Rendering issue when preview is enabled.Rebuilding is not using existing folder/filelist indexes.Folder indexes not updating folder information (date modified/attributes).Folder indexes not updating recent changes.ReFS indexing not working for some volumes.inline renaming doesn't obey listview wrapping rules: wrap with search.subst indexes are lost after re-indexing.ReFS indexing not working for small system pages (small volumes).rc: is disabled, use dm: (rc: can be enabled from Tools -> Options -> Indexes -> Index recent changes).when exclude hidden files is enabled, hiding a folder hides the parent instead.I now can copy them back to the SSD they were originally on and see how long that transfer takes. I don't anticipate having to do this transfer again, so not a burning issue was just curious if that was expected since copying 170MB worth of files and it taking over 4 hours to complete seemed a bit excessive, no matter how slow the disk they're being copied to. The 500GB SSD I originally had these files on had gotten full due to other music instrument library audio files I added, where I had to transfer this folder along with those audio files to a larger capacity disc since the program I'm using requires the library audio files and their associated midi files be placed under the same folder on a drive. At least to be able to figure out if there's something odd going on here when using FFS. ![]() It will likely take me some running of multiple test comparisons doing comparison transfers using Windows file explorer and FFS with and without anti-virus turned on to see if there any significant differences in transfer times. I still need to figure out why this transfer takes so long. Differences between Windows 7 on your side and Windows 10 on my PC of the handling of the NTFS format and small files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |